Lantz v. Lantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lantz v. Lantz

282 A.D. 664, 122 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 664 (Lantz v. Lantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lantz v. Lantz, 282 A.D. 664, 122 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Insofar as the court disposed of the application to vacate the interlocutory judgment and vacate defendant’s default with permission to answer, we think the disposition was proper. There are circumstances referred to in the present case however, which indicate that some further action might be considered with respect to the custody of the children. Order unanimously modified by referring the matter back to Special Term to determine whether such action is necessary and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 837.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insofar as the court disposed of the application to vacate the interlocutory judgment and vacate defendant’s default with permission to answer, we think the disposition was proper. There are circumstances referred to in the present case however, which indicate that some further action might be considered with respect to the custody of the children. Order unanimously modified by referring the matter back to Special Term to determine whether such action is necessary and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 837.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 664, 122 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lantz-v-lantz-nyappdiv-1953.