Lantz, J. v. Alexander
This text of Lantz, J. v. Alexander (Lantz, J. v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JONATHAN LANTZ, : No. 82 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : HELENE ALEXANDER, DANIELLE : WARD, ANTHONY VERNA, RUSSELL : REDDING, THOMAS WOLF, JOHN C. : TYLWALK, DAVID J. ARNOLD JR., : BARBARA A. SMITH, STEPHANIE : AXARLIS, GREGORY JORDAN, JULIE : KLIM, PSPCA'S CEO, KITTY BLOCK, : ACTING PRESIDENT AND CEO THE : HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED : STATES, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus/ Prohibition” is DENIED, and
the Applications for Nunc Pro Tunc Relief are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lantz, J. v. Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lantz-j-v-alexander-pa-2018.