Lantis v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Lantis v. Davidson

72 P. 1100, 66 Kan. 795, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 178

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 11, 1903

DocketNo. 13,034

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P. 1100 (Lantis v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lantis v. Davidson, 72 P. 1100, 66 Kan. 795, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 178 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The wife of George H. Lantis sought to enjoin the execution of a writ of possession for land which she claimed as a homestead. The facts leading up to the controversy will be found in the statement of the case of Lantis v. Davidson, 60 Kan. 389, 56 Pac. 745. After that decision Davidson obtained a judgment in forcible de[796]*796tainer against Lantis for possession. The interest of Mrs. Lantis in the property was not of such a nature, that she could maintain injunction.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The wife of George H. Lantis sought to enjoin the execution of a writ of possession for land which she claimed as a homestead. The facts leading up to the controversy will be found in the statement of the case of Lantis v. Davidson, 60 Kan. 389, 56 Pac. 745. After that decision Davidson obtained a judgment in forcible de[796]*796tainer against Lantis for possession. The interest of Mrs. Lantis in the property was not of such a nature, that she could maintain injunction.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P. 1100, 66 Kan. 795, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lantis-v-davidson-kan-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack