Lanterman v. Smith
168 A. 748, 114 N.J. Eq. 267, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 905
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Ordinary Baches, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 231; sub nom. In re Lanterman.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Parker, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lanterman v. Smith, 168 A. 748, 114 N.J. Eq. 267, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 905 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 748 (Lanterman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Tuyl v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.
108 A.2d 483 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Janvari v. Peter Schweitzer Co.
91 A.2d 113 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)