Lanterman v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Lanterman v. Smith

168 A. 748, 114 N.J. Eq. 267, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 905

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 16, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 A. 748 (Lanterman v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanterman v. Smith, 168 A. 748, 114 N.J. Eq. 267, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 905 (N.J. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Ordinary Baches, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 231; sub nom. In re Lanterman.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Parker, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Ordinary Baches, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 231; sub nom. In re Lanterman.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Parker, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfielb, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A. 748, 114 N.J. Eq. 267, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanterman-v-smith-nj-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack