Lant v. Louisville, Cin. & Lex. Railroad
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 445 (Lant v. Louisville, Cin. & Lex. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It is alleged that the misrepresentations and fraud complained of were not made and perpetrated in the sale of the lot for which the note sued on was executed but in the. sale of another lot [446]*446made months before. We do not see well how unliquidated damages for fraud in an altogether different transaction, having no connection with the contract out of which this action grew, can be allowed as a set-off to the demand herein set up. We therefore conclude that the demurrer to the answers were properly sustained.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 445, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lant-v-louisville-cin-lex-railroad-kyctapp-1871.