Lansley v. Nietert

42 N.W. 635, 78 Iowa 758, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 5, 1889·Published

Opinion

Rothrook, J.

The amount in controversy as shown by the petition and injunction bond, which is made x>art of the petition, does not exceed one hundred dollars, and the case comes to us upon a certificate of the trial judge as provided by statute. This certificate sets out the facts at great length. It is not necessary to reproduce the facts in this opinion. It js sufficient to say that we are unable to [759] discover any substantial difference between the question certified|in this case and that reviewed in the case of Thomas v. McDaneld, 77 Iowa, 299. We held in that case that under the facts found by the court the plaintiff was entitled to recover attorney’s fees upon the injunction bond. Following that case the judgment in the case at bar will be ' Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lansley v. Nietert, 42 N.W. 635, 78 Iowa 758, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 338 (iowa 1889).

42 N.W. 635 (Lansley v. Nietert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. McDaneld
42 N.W. 301 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)