Lansing v. Stevens
This text of 3 N.Y.S. 79 (Lansing v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The precise question which is presented upon this appeal has-been decided by the general term of the Second district, (Oulman v. Schmidt, 35 Hun, 345.) The decision was placed upon that ground, although there-was another fatal defect in the proceedings in that case, which was considered, as appears by the opinion. * That case was cited as authority in Thames-v. Jones, 4*7 Hun, 81. We think the case of Oulman v. Schmidt, supra, should be followed by this court. The judgment of the county court, and of', ■the city court of Albany, should be reversed, with costs.
Learned, P. J., and Landon, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.Y.S. 79, 20 N.Y. St. Rep. 320, 50 Hun 605, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-v-stevens-nysupct-1888.