Lansing v. Orcott

New York Supreme Court

Lansing v. Orcott

16 Johns. 4

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 Johns. 4 (Lansing v. Orcott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansing v. Orcott, 16 Johns. 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There are so many parties interested in this case, and the facts are so complex, that we cannot, on this application, do justice to all concerned. We shall, therefore, order a stay of the execution for three months, to the end, that the parties may apply to the Court of Chancery -r and that no costs are to he allowed to either side. We do not refuse to interfere farther, on the ground of any want of jurisdiction ; for we should not hesitate to grant relief, if it was such a clear case, that we could do justice to all the parties interested.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There are so many parties interested in this case, and the facts are so complex, that we cannot, on this application, do justice to all concerned. We shall, therefore, order a stay of the execution for three months, to the end, that the parties may apply to the Court of Chancery -r and that no costs are to he allowed to either side. We do not refuse to interfere farther, on the ground of any want of jurisdiction ; for we should not hesitate to grant relief, if it was such a clear case, that we could do justice to all the parties interested.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Johns. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-v-orcott-nysupct-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack