Lansing v. Orcott

16 Johns. 4
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1819·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There are so many parties interested in this case, and the facts are so complex, that we cannot, on this application, do justice to all concerned. We shall, therefore, order a stay of the execution for three months, to the end, that the parties may apply to the Court of Chancery -r and that no costs are to he allowed to either side. We do not refuse to interfere farther, on the ground of any want of jurisdiction ; for we should not hesitate to grant relief, if it was such a clear case, that we could do justice to all the parties interested.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lansing v. Orcott, 16 Johns. 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

16 Johns. 4 (Lansing v. Orcott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. Heathcock
15 N.W. 9 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1883)
People v. Hektograph Co.
10 Abb. N. Cas. 358 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)
Woodward v. Till
1 Mich. N.P. 210 (Bay County Circuit Court, 1870)
McDonald v. Falvey
18 Wis. 571 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1864)