Lansing v. M'Killup
7 Cow. 416
Opinion
The service was regular on Mr. Russell. Though Mr. Allen alone is named, they are, in effect, both of them attorneys in the cause. It is E. & A. acting under the firm of A.; and their rights and liabilities are the same as if both names appeared.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lansing v. M'Killup, 7 Cow. 416 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
7 Cow. 416 (Lansing v. M'Killup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Livingston v. Cox
6 Pa. 360 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1847)