Lansing v. M'Killup
7 Cow. 416
This text of 7 Cow. 416 (Lansing v. M'Killup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lansing v. M'Killup, 7 Cow. 416 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
Opinion
The service was regular on Mr. Russell. Though Mr. Allen alone is named, they are, in effect, both of them attorneys in the cause. It is E. & A. acting under the firm of A.; and their rights and liabilities are the same as if both names appeared.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Livingston v. Cox
6 Pa. 360 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1847)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-v-mkillup-nysupct-1827.