Lansing v. Mickles
1 How. Pr. 248
This text of 1 How. Pr. 248 (Lansing v. Mickles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lansing v. Mickles, 1 How. Pr. 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
It was insisted on the part of the plaintiff that the affidavit did not come within the rule ; it did not state that the witness was material, on the advice of counsel after he had stated his case, fyc.
Denied the motion with costs, and without prejudice, on the defect mentioned in the affidavit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-v-mickles-nysupct-1845.