Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC
779 N.W.2d 805
Opinion
LANSING PAVILION, L.L.C., Plaintiff Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
EASTWOOD, L.L.C., Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
L.L. & 127, L.L.C., Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
J.R. Anderson Development Company, and Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate, Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and
D J. McQuestion & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
STS Consultants, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 6, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC, 779 N.W.2d 805 (Mich. 2010).
779 N.W.2d 805 (Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gillie v. GENESEE COUNTY TREASURER
779 N.W.2d 805 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)