Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC
725 N.W.2d 34, 477 Mich. 974
This text of 725 N.W.2d 34 (Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC, 725 N.W.2d 34, 477 Mich. 974 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
LANSING PAVILION, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
EASTWOOD, L.L.C., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
LL & 127, L.L.C., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
J.R. Anderson Development Company, and Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and
STS Consultants, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, and
D.J. McQuestion & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*35 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
725 N.W.2d 34, 477 Mich. 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-pavilion-llc-v-eastwood-llc-mich-2006.