Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC
725 N.W.2d 34, 477 Mich. 974
Opinion
LANSING PAVILION, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
EASTWOOD, L.L.C., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, and
LL & 127, L.L.C., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
J.R. Anderson Development Company, and Jeffrey R. Anderson Real Estate Inc., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, and
STS Consultants, Ltd., Third-Party Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, and
D.J. McQuestion & Sons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*35 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC, 725 N.W.2d 34, 477 Mich. 974 (Mich. 2006).
725 N.W.2d 34 (Lansing Pavilion, LLC v. Eastwood, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.