Lansing & Co. v. Hesing

Seventh Circuit

Lansing & Co. v. Hesing

81 F. 242, 26 C.C.A. 382, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1855

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMay 28, 1897

DocketNo. 370

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 F. 242 (Lansing & Co. v. Hesing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansing & Co. v. Hesing, 81 F. 242, 26 C.C.A. 382, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1855 (7th Cir. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying an injunction against the appellee ‘as postmaster at Chicago. After the appeal was taken, the appéllee resigned the office, and his successor has been appointed. On the authority of U. S. v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, Secretary v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. 298, and U. S. v. Lochren, 164 U. S. 701, 17 Sup. Ct. 1001, the appeal is dismissed, without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying an injunction against the appellee ‘as postmaster at Chicago. After the appeal was taken, the appéllee resigned the office, and his successor has been appointed. On the authority of U. S. v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, Secretary v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. 298, and U. S. v. Lochren, 164 U. S. 701, 17 Sup. Ct. 1001, the appeal is dismissed, without costs to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 F. 242, 26 C.C.A. 382, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansing-co-v-hesing-ca7-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack