Lansford v. Roessler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lansford v. Roessler

200 S.W.3d 563, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316, 2006 WL 2529712

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 5, 2006

DocketED 87107

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W.3d 563 (Lansford v. Roessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansford v. Roessler, 200 S.W.3d 563, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316, 2006 WL 2529712 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John E. Roessler (Husband) appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Christy Lansford (Wife). On appeal, Husband argues the trial court erred in its allocation of marital property and marital debt, and in its award of attorney’s fees to Wife in the amount of $3,000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John E. Roessler (Husband) appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Christy Lansford (Wife). On appeal, Husband argues the trial court erred in its allocation of marital property and marital debt, and in its award of attorney’s fees to Wife in the amount of $3,000. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 563, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316, 2006 WL 2529712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansford-v-roessler-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack