Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 378
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1960
DocketNo. 64910; protests 58/4548, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cust. Ct. 378 (Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 378 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed [379]*379upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United, States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise were held dutiable as follows: (a) All items except such items as were imported from the Soviet Zone of Germany and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after August 31, 1951, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547(a), as modified, supra; and (b) all items imported from the Soviet Zone of Germany and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, after August 31, 1951, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) of the tariff act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States
39 C.C.P.A. 15 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cust. Ct. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansen-naeve-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1960.