Lansburgh v. Walsh

City of New York Municipal Court

Lansburgh v. Walsh

8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1149, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 403

DecidedMay 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Misc. 693 (Lansburgh v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lansburgh v. Walsh, 8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1149, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 403 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The facts as they appear in the appeal book are substantially the same as on the former appeal (Landsburgh v. Walsh, 48 N. Y. St. Repr. 639), and for the reasons [694]*694stated in the opinion of Van Wyck, J., the case was one for determination by a jury, and for not sending it to the jury the nonsuit ordered on the first trial was set aside.

The second trial (that which we are now reviewing) seems to have been conducted on the lines laid down in the opinion filed on the former appeal (48 N. Y. St. Repr. supra), and the finding of the jury in favor of the plaintiff being satisfactorily sustained by the evidence, and no errors appearing in the rulings which require correction by a new trial, it follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The facts as they appear in the appeal book are substantially the same as on the former appeal (Landsburgh v. Walsh, 48 N. Y. St. Repr. 639), and for the reasons [694]*694stated in the opinion of Van Wyck, J., the case was one for determination by a jury, and for not sending it to the jury the nonsuit ordered on the first trial was set aside.

The second trial (that which we are now reviewing) seems to have been conducted on the lines laid down in the opinion filed on the former appeal (48 N. Y. St. Repr. supra), and the finding of the jury in favor of the plaintiff being satisfactorily sustained by the evidence, and no errors appearing in the rulings which require correction by a new trial, it follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Misc. 693, 28 N.Y.S. 1149, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lansburgh-v-walsh-nynyccityct-1894.