Lanpher-Skinner Co. v. Quam

North Dakota Supreme Court

Lanpher-Skinner Co. v. Quam

131 N.W. 246, 21 N.D. 348, 1911 N.D. LEXIS 106

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided March 28, 1911·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action involves the identical questions decided at this term in the case of Weil v. Quam, ante, 344, 131 N. W. 244, and it was agreed that the decision in this case should follow that.

The judgment of the lower court in dissolving the attachment is therefore affirmed.

All concur, except Morgan, Oh. J.,, not participating, and Burke, J.,. disqualified. Burke, J., having tried the case below, did not sit in the case, and took no part in the decision, Honorable Charles A. Pollock,. Judge of the Third Judicial District, sitting in his stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action involves the identical questions decided at this term in the case of Weil v. Quam, ante, 344, 131 N. W. 244, and it was agreed that the decision in this case should follow that.

The judgment of the lower court in dissolving the attachment is therefore affirmed.

All concur, except Morgan, Oh. J.,, not participating, and Burke, J.,. disqualified. Burke, J., having tried the case below, did not sit in the case, and took no part in the decision, Honorable Charles A. Pollock,. Judge of the Third Judicial District, sitting in his stead.

Lanpher-Skinner Co. v. Quam, 131 N.W. 246, 21 N.D. 348, 1911 N.D. LEXIS 106 (N.D. 1911).

Pincite

131 N.W. 246 (Lanpher-Skinner Co. v. Quam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related