Lannum v. State ex rel. Roberts

1 Ind. L. Rep. 818
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ind. L. Rep. 818 (Lannum v. State ex rel. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lannum v. State ex rel. Roberts, 1 Ind. L. Rep. 818 (Ind. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Mr. Justice Elliott.

The appellant was prosecuted upon a charge of bastardy preferred against him by the relatrix, and from the judgments rendered against him has appealed.

Two points are here made by counsel. The first is, that the verdict is not supported by the evidence, but this can avail the appellant nothing, because, although the evidence is very conflicting, there is much supporting the conclusion arrived at by the jury. The second point (had counsel observed the logical order this would have been the first), is, that the record does not show that any complaint was filed before the justice. Since the 'brief was filed, the clerk, in obedience to a certiorari, has certified up the complaint, and the proposition of counsel is entirely without foundation.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ind. L. Rep. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lannum-v-state-ex-rel-roberts-ind-1881.