Lannon v. Carroll Towing Co.

235 A.D. 690
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 235 A.D. 690 (Lannon v. Carroll Towing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lannon v. Carroll Towing Co., 235 A.D. 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted vacating the preclusion order and permitting plaintiff to serve his bill of partieidars within five days. It is evident that the order requiring the plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars and the following preclusion order were taken through the neglect of the attorneys then representing the plaintiff, and the plaintiff had no knowledge thereof. All proceedings in his action were subsequently stayed by an order of the United [691]*691States District Court, and there has been no inexcusable delay since the stay terminated and the plaintiff’s present attorneys were substituted. He is entitled to his day in court to have his case finally disposed of by a fair trial. (See Allen v. Fink, 211 App. Div. 411, 415; Baldwin v. Yellow Taxi Corporation, 221 id. 717, 718.) Lazansky, P. L, Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.
208 Misc. 89 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
In re the Estate of McCleary
268 A.D. 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lannon-v-carroll-towing-co-nyappdiv-1932.