Lanning v. Lanning

262 S.E.2d 788, 245 Ga. 19, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 670
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 3, 1980
Docket35713
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 262 S.E.2d 788 (Lanning v. Lanning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanning v. Lanning, 262 S.E.2d 788, 245 Ga. 19, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 670 (Ga. 1980).

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

The parties to this suit were divorced in the Fulton Superior Court in March of 1976. Under the divorce decree, the wife was given custody of the parties’ minor children. However, in August of 1976, she voluntarily relinquished custody of the children to her former husband, and the children have resided with him in Fulton County since that time.

In July of 1977, the former husband brought this suit in the Fulton Superior Court for a change of child custody. The former wife was served, but she did not file an answer or responsive pleadings. She did sign an order in which she consented to the modification of the parties’ divorce decree by granting custody of their minor children to the former husband. A judgment was entered to this effect.

In August of 1978, the former wife filed a motion to set aside the judgment modifying child custody on the ground that the Fulton Superior Court lacked jurisdiction of her person and venue in that she was a resident of Clayton County. She also alleged fraud and coercion in the procurement of her consent to the modification order. The superior court granted the former wife’s motion to set aside the judgment on the ground that the former wife was a resident of Clayton County when the petition for change of custody was filed in the Fulton Superior Court. The former husband appeals. We reverse.

As we have recently held in Williams v. Fuller, 244 Ga. 846, (1979), lack of jurisdiction of the person and improper venue are defenses which are waived under Code Ann. § 81A-112 (h) when not raised in a motion or a responsive pleading as originally filed. Accordingly, these defenses were waived here.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Brown
443 S.E.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Daust v. Daust
418 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Harbin Enterprises, Inc. v. Sysco Corporation
394 S.E.2d 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 S.E.2d 788, 245 Ga. 19, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanning-v-lanning-ga-1980.