LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
This text of 252 S.W.3d 412 (LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant has filed no brief. On June 13, 1995, this Court notified appellant by letter that this appeal would be dismissed if no party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 60(a)(2). Appellant has filed no response to this letter and has not filed a motion for extension to file the brief.
This Court may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant files no brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 74 (0(1); *413 Lewis v. City of Port Arthur, 727 S.W.2d 36 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1987, no writ)(appeal dismissed where appellant did not file statement of facts, brief or motions to extend time). Appellant has done nothing but file the transcript.
Accordingly we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 S.W.3d 412, 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 4102, 1995 WL 684890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lannie-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-1995.