LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

252 S.W.3d 412, 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 4102, 1995 WL 684890
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 16, 1995·No. 01-95-00349-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has filed no brief. On June 13, 1995, this Court notified appellant by letter that this appeal would be dismissed if no party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 60(a)(2). Appellant has filed no response to this letter and has not filed a motion for extension to file the brief.

This Court may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant files no brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 74 (0(1); *413 Lewis v. City of Port Arthur, 727 S.W.2d 36 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1987, no writ)(appeal dismissed where appellant did not file statement of facts, brief or motions to extend time). Appellant has done nothing but file the transcript.

Accordingly we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 252 S.W.3d 412, 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 4102, 1995 WL 684890 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

252 S.W.3d 412 (LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruiz v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
252 S.W.3d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)