Lankford v. Pope

60 S.E.2d 242, 207 Ga. 242, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lankford v. Pope. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 Ga. 430
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1950·No. No. 17181·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

On a former appearance (Lankford v. Pope, 206 Ga. 430 (57 S. E. 2d, 538)), in reviewing a ruling made on demurrer to the petition to recover land, it was held that the deed relied upon by the petitioner contained a key that, if aided by extrinsic evidence, might supply a legal description. That key was held by us to be “said piece of land designated by stakes, containing % acre.” Upon the trial considerable testimony was introduced, but none of it even mentioned a lot designated by stakes as described in the deed upon which the suit was predicated, and a nonsuit was granted. The exception to that order is without merit. See Blumberg v. Nathan, 190 Ga. 64 (8 S. E. 2d, 374).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. C. Lankford and Grantham & Smith, for plaintiff. Sapp & Ewing, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lankford v. Pope, 60 S.E.2d 242, 207 Ga. 242, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 400 (Ga. 1950).

60 S.E.2d 242 (Lankford v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lankford v. Pope
57 S.E.2d 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Blumberg v. Nathan
8 S.E.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)