Lankford v. Kirkland

62 S.E.2d 836, 207 Ga. 504, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 437
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 8, 1951·No. No. 17303·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

A writ of mandamus is not an available remedy to compel the discharge of a duty of a commissioner appointed by the court to partition lands. Evans v. White, 178 Ga. 262 (172 S. E. 913). The duties of a commissioner appointed by the court to partition lands, under Chapter 85-15 of the Georgia Code of 1933, are purely administrative, and to issue a mandamus to require one of the commissioners to act would be the equivalent of the court ordering [505]*505itself to act. Failure to act might be grounds for contempt proceedings but not for mandamus.

No. 17303. January 8, 1951. W. C. Lankford, for plaintiffs. George H. Mingledorff, R. A. Moore, and Memory & Memory for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lankford v. Kirkland, 62 S.E.2d 836, 207 Ga. 504, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 437 (Ga. 1951).

62 S.E.2d 836 (Lankford v. Kirkland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. White
172 S.E. 913 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)