Lanier v. State

105 S.E. 648, 26 Ga. App. 204, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 66
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 25, 1921
Docket11950
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 648 (Lanier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanier v. State, 105 S.E. 648, 26 Ga. App. 204, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which, the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based was merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and therefore did not require a new trial.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke a/nd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 648, 26 Ga. App. 204, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-v-state-gactapp-1921.