Lanier v. State

38 Fla. Supp. 2d 46
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedSeptember 26, 1989
DocketCase No. 88-3AM (County Court Case No. 87-22, 508TT-FP)
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Fla. Supp. 2d 46 (Lanier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanier v. State, 38 Fla. Supp. 2d 46 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1989).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Fla. Stat. § 316.193 (1987) which makes it unlawful to drive under [47]*47the influence of alcohol “within this State” was properly enforced against appellant who drove his car through a restaurant and marina parking lot to the boat ramp and allowed it to roll into the lake with his sleeping passenger inside. Zink v State, 448 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

There was no showing that the omitted or erased portions of a video tape were exculpatory and there was no showing of misconduct by the state, so the court properly denied the motion to dismiss the charges. Melendez v State, 498 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1986). McNEAL, R., PETERSON, E., TOMBRINK, R., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melendez v. State
498 So. 2d 1258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Zink v. State
448 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Fla. Supp. 2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-v-state-flacirct-1989.