Lanier v. Southern Railway Co.
23 S.E.2d 328, 222 N.C. 756, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 135
This text of 23 S.E.2d 328 (Lanier v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lanier v. Southern Railway Co., 23 S.E.2d 328, 222 N.C. 756, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 135 (N.C. 1942).
Opinion
It does not appear that the plaintiff has been prejudiced by the deletion of certain clauses and allegations from his complaint, even if it be conceded that some of the matters stricken out, while redundant, may not have been irrelevant. C. S., 537. As no harm has come to the plaintiff, the judgment will be upheld.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 S.E.2d 328, 222 N.C. 756, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1942.