Lanier v. Southern Railway Co.
23 S.E.2d 328, 222 N.C. 756, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 135
Opinion
It does not appear that the plaintiff has been prejudiced by the deletion of certain clauses and allegations from his complaint, even if it be conceded that some of the matters stricken out, while redundant, may not have been irrelevant. C. S., 537. As no harm has come to the plaintiff, the judgment will be upheld.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lanier v. Southern Railway Co., 23 S.E.2d 328, 222 N.C. 756, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 135 (N.C. 1942).
23 S.E.2d 328 (Lanier v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.