Lanier v. Norwood Equipment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lanier v. Norwood Equipment Corp.

17 A.D.2d 637, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 637 (Lanier v. Norwood Equipment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanier v. Norwood Equipment Corp., 17 A.D.2d 637, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Norwood Equipment Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 14,1961, denying conditionally its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 156), the condition imposed being that plaintiff shall notice the action for trial at the next available term; and the defendant Central Rigging Corp. appeals from an order of said court, dated February 8, 1962, denying conditionally its motion for the same relief, the same condition being imposed. Orders affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Norwood Equipment Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 14,1961, denying conditionally its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 156), the condition imposed being that plaintiff shall notice the action for trial at the next available term; and the defendant Central Rigging Corp. appeals from an order of said court, dated February 8, 1962, denying conditionally its motion for the same relief, the same condition being imposed. Orders affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 637, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-v-norwood-equipment-corp-nyappdiv-1962.