Lanier v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Lanier v. Mayo

115 So. 2d 3

DecidedOctober 7, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 2d 3 (Lanier v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanier v. Mayo, 115 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the return filed to the writ of habeas corpus previously issued. The return establishes that petitioner is legally in custody under valid commitments of courts of competent jurisdiction.

A favorable decision on the convictions and sentences attacked by petitioner would not result in his release at this time. Hitson v. Mayo, Fla., 82 So.2d 591. Hence the application is premature, the writ is discharged, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ROBERTS, and THORNAL, JJ., and DONALD K. CARROLL, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the return filed to the writ of habeas corpus previously issued. The return establishes that petitioner is legally in custody under valid commitments of courts of competent jurisdiction.

A favorable decision on the convictions and sentences attacked by petitioner would not result in his release at this time. Hitson v. Mayo, Fla., 82 So.2d 591. Hence the application is premature, the writ is discharged, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, ROBERTS, and THORNAL, JJ., and DONALD K. CARROLL, District Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 2d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-v-mayo-fla-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack