Lanier Feed Mill, Inc. v. Tonge
This text of 155 S.E.2d 863 (Lanier Feed Mill, Inc. v. Tonge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the plaintiff creditor established a prima facie right of recovery against the defendant debtor on two promissory notes and the defendant filed a plea of recoupment, based upon the plaintiff’s alleged failure to properly grade defendant’s eggs purchased by it over a period of time and failure to credit the defendant’s indebtedness accordingly as agreed, expert evidence of the classification as to size of one sample of defendant’s unwashed eggs, introduced by the defendant, had no probative value with regard to the issue of improper grading, because, in addition to grading as to size, the eggs were also routinely washed, then graded according to the United States Department of Agriculture’s standards as to cleanliness, based upon the amount of residual stains after the washing for the reason that the defendant’s grading did not eliminate the possibility that the eggs would have been found of inferior grade after being [753]*753washed; therefore, the court erred in its judgment denying the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 S.E.2d 863, 115 Ga. App. 752, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanier-feed-mill-inc-v-tonge-gactapp-1967.