Lanham v. State
429 So. 2d 1374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28956
Opinion
Upon review of the record and the contentions of the parties we are of the view that all of the appellants are entitled to a judgment in their favor upon the state’s claim of forfeiture and upon the state’s assessment of storage charges. See U.S. v. Lace, 502 F.Supp. 1021 (D.Vt.1980); aff’d 669 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.1982); Bloom v. State, 283 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and § 933.14, Fla.Stat. (1979). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand with directions for entry of judgment in favor of appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lanham v. State, 429 So. 2d 1374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
429 So. 2d 1374 (Lanham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn Pollack
669 F.2d 46 (Second Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Lace
502 F. Supp. 1021 (D. Vermont, 1980)
Bloom v. State
283 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)