Lanham v. State

429 So. 2d 1374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28956
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1983
DocketNo. 81-1623
StatusPublished

This text of 429 So. 2d 1374 (Lanham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lanham v. State, 429 So. 2d 1374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28956 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record and the contentions of the parties we are of the view that all of the appellants are entitled to a judgment in their favor upon the state’s claim of forfeiture and upon the state’s assessment of storage charges. See U.S. v. Lace, 502 F.Supp. 1021 (D.Vt.1980); aff’d 669 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.1982); Bloom v. State, 283 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and § 933.14, Fla.Stat. (1979). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand with directions for entry of judgment in favor of appellants.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lace
502 F. Supp. 1021 (D. Vermont, 1980)
Bloom v. State
283 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 So. 2d 1374, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanham-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.