Lanham v. Bomar
116 S.E. 926, 123 S.C. 483, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
*486 The order of Judge Sease, appealed from -in this case, is affirmed, under the cases of Finley v. Robertson, 17 S. C., 435; Whitesides v. Barber, 24 S. C., 373; Riker v. Vaughan, 23 S. C., 187; Tederall v. Bouknight, 25 S. C., 275; Harrison v. Lightsey, 32 S. C., 293, 10 S. E., 1010; and the more recent case of Bradley v. Calhoun, 116 S. C., 7, 106 S. E., 843. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lanham v. Bomar, 116 S.E. 926, 123 S.C. 483, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78 (S.C. 1923).
116 S.E. 926 (Lanham v. Bomar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradley v. Calhoun
106 S.E. 843 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)
Harrison v. Lightsey
10 S.E. 1010 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1890)