Lanham v. Bomar

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Lanham v. Bomar

116 S.E. 926, 123 S.C. 483, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 15, 1923

Docket11152

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 926 (Lanham v. Bomar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lanham v. Bomar, 116 S.E. 926, 123 S.C. 483, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78 (S.C. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

*486 The order of Judge Sease, appealed from -in this case, is affirmed, under the cases of Finley v. Robertson, 17 S. C., 435; Whitesides v. Barber, 24 S. C., 373; Riker v. Vaughan, 23 S. C., 187; Tederall v. Bouknight, 25 S. C., 275; Harrison v. Lightsey, 32 S. C., 293, 10 S. E., 1010; and the more recent case of Bradley v. Calhoun, 116 S. C., 7, 106 S. E., 843. Affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary, and Messrs. Justices Fraser and Marion concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

*486 The order of Judge Sease, appealed from -in this case, is affirmed, under the cases of Finley v. Robertson, 17 S. C., 435; Whitesides v. Barber, 24 S. C., 373; Riker v. Vaughan, 23 S. C., 187; Tederall v. Bouknight, 25 S. C., 275; Harrison v. Lightsey, 32 S. C., 293, 10 S. E., 1010; and the more recent case of Bradley v. Calhoun, 116 S. C., 7, 106 S. E., 843. Affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Gary, and Messrs. Justices Fraser and Marion concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 926, 123 S.C. 483, 1923 S.C. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lanham-v-bomar-sc-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack