Langworthy v. Waters

11 Iowa 432
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 11, 1861·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

The defendants appeals from the judgment of the District Court overruling a motion to dissolve ah [433] attachment claimed to have been issued in said cause. The record shows that an amended petition was filed prior to the. ruling of the court upon the motion to dissolve. The defective affidavit may have been cured by the amended petition. A defective affidavit may be amended in substance as well as in form. Bunn v. Pritchard, 6 Iowa 56. Neither the writ of attachment nor the amended petition is made part of the record of the case. Without them, we are unable to say that the court below erred in its rulings.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langworthy v. Waters, 11 Iowa 432 (iowa 1861).

11 Iowa 432 (Langworthy v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarke Banking Co. v. Wright
55 N.W. 1060 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Struthers v. McDowell
5 Neb. 491 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1877)
In re McKibben
16 F. Cas. 210 (E.D. Michigan, 1874)
Carmichael v. Bodfish
32 Iowa 418 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)
Shaffer v. Sundwall
33 Iowa 579 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)