Langston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Langston v. State

603 So. 2d 104, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8406, 1992 WL 183974

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 4, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2426

StatusPublished

This text of 603 So. 2d 104 (Langston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langston v. State, 603 So. 2d 104, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8406, 1992 WL 183974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Henry Langston, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for two counts of sexual battery. As to the first point on appeal, after consideration of the proffer made by defense counsel, we are unable to see that the witness then on the stand was in a position to testify to anything other than hearsay with respect to the incident in question. It also does not appear that the proffer satisfied the requirements for demonstrating an exception under subsection 794.022, Florida Statutes (1991).

As to the second point on appeal, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in exclusion of the investigator’s testimony.

Finally, no error has been shown with respect to the admission of the child hearsay statements pursuant to subsection 90.-803(23), Florida Statutes (1991). See also State v. Pardo, 582 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), modified, 596 So.2d 665 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI