Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Langston v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

Langston v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

40 A.3d 1232, 615 Pa. 85, 2012 WL 1021076, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 667
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 28, 2012
DocketNo. 150 EM 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.3d 1232 (Langston v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langston v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, 40 A.3d 1232, 615 Pa. 85, 2012 WL 1021076, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 667 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. Commonwealth v. Jette, 23 A.3d 1032 (Pa.2011); Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permissible). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Commonwealth v. Jette
23 A.3d 1032 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.3d 1232, 615 Pa. 85, 2012 WL 1021076, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langston-v-philadelphia-court-of-common-pleas-pa-2012.