Langston v. City of Hazlehurst
89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 308, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 317
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting as to a violation of the “blind-tiger” ordinance of the city, as set forth in the petition for certiorari, but there was ample evidence to sustain the conviction; and, no error of law being complained of, the court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Langston v. City of Hazlehurst, 89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 308, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 317 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 375 (Langston v. City of Hazlehurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gresham v. State
98 S.E.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)