Langston v. City of Hazlehurst
89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 308, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 317
This text of 89 S.E. 375 (Langston v. City of Hazlehurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Langston v. City of Hazlehurst, 89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 308, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 317 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting as to a violation of the “blind-tiger” ordinance of the city, as set forth in the petition for certiorari, but there was ample evidence to sustain the conviction; and, no error of law being complained of, the court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gresham v. State
98 S.E.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 375, 18 Ga. App. 308, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langston-v-city-of-hazlehurst-gactapp-1916.