Langston v. Armontrout

Missouri Court of Appeals

Langston v. Armontrout

755 S.W.2d 10, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599, 1988 WL 76071

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 1988·No. No. WD 39933·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment in declaratory judgment action ordering Parole Board hearing upon cancellation of plaintiffs presumptive release date, and dismissing plaintiffs petition without prejudice upon Parole Board’s compliance with such order. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Cause remanded for entry of modified judgment ordering reinstatement of June 11, 1985, presumptive release date and ordering vacation of the Parole Board’s order canceling said presumptive release date, unless and until plaintiffs alleged conduct violation is established upon a hearing of which defendant has notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment in declaratory judgment action ordering Parole Board hearing upon cancellation of plaintiffs presumptive release date, and dismissing plaintiffs petition without prejudice upon Parole Board’s compliance with such order. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Cause remanded for entry of modified judgment ordering reinstatement of June 11, 1985, presumptive release date and ordering vacation of the Parole Board’s order canceling said presumptive release date, unless and until plaintiffs alleged conduct violation is established upon a hearing of which defendant has notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Langston v. Armontrout, 755 S.W.2d 10, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599, 1988 WL 76071 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

755 S.W.2d 10 (Langston v. Armontrout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.