Langston Oliver v. Officer Cox, Officer Harper

911 F.2d 723

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 27, 1990
• Docket: 90-6071
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

911 F.2d 723
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Langston OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Officer COX, Officer Harper, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6071.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 25, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Sept. 27, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 89-378-G)

Langston Oliver, appellant pro se.

Lucien Capone, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Langston Oliver appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Oliver v. Cox, C/A No. 89-378-G (M.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.