Langstaff v. Langstaff

1 Wright 148, 1 Ohio Ch. 148
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

It seems that this defendant has abandoned his family and character, and taken up with the strumpet, Mrs. Kimberly ; and although we have no direct or positive evidence of adultery, we have that which leaves no doubt of his guilt. His conduct *cannot be reconciled with innocence. We decree a [149 divorce, and that the defendant pay the complainant $500 for alimony, and the costs; and in default, that she have execution for the amount, with interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langstaff v. Langstaff, 1 Wright 148, 1 Ohio Ch. 148 (Ohio 1832).

1 Wright 148 (Langstaff v. Langstaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heilbruner & Co. v. Wayte
51 Pa. 259 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)