Langsam v. Tindera
Opinion
We dismiss as moot the plaintiffs appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson & Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.
Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiffs appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
580 N.E.2d 1157 (Langsam v. Tindera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.