Langsam v. Tindera

580 N.E.2d 1157, 64 Ohio App. 3d 228
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 22, 1990
DocketNo. 57812.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 580 N.E.2d 1157 (Langsam v. Tindera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langsam v. Tindera, 580 N.E.2d 1157, 64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We dismiss as moot the plaintiffs appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson & Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.

Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiffs appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Ann McManamon, C.J., Krupansky and John F. Corrigan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earth Mobile, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
2023 Ohio 3354 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State v. Diol
2019 Ohio 2197 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 N.E.2d 1157, 64 Ohio App. 3d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langsam-v-tindera-ohioctapp-1990.