Langsam v. Tindera

580 N.E.2d 1157, 64 Ohio App. 3d 228
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 1990·No. No. 57812.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We dismiss as moot the plaintiffs appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson & Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.

Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiffs appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Ann McManamon, C.J., Krupansky and John F. Corrigan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langsam v. Tindera, 580 N.E.2d 1157, 64 Ohio App. 3d 228 (Ohio Ct. App. 1990).

580 N.E.2d 1157 (Langsam v. Tindera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earth Mobile, Inc. v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
2023 Ohio 3354 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State v. Diol
2019 Ohio 2197 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)