Langlotz v. Valentine

905 F.2d 1530, 1990 WL 74311
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1990
Docket88-3856
StatusUnpublished

This text of 905 F.2d 1530 (Langlotz v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langlotz v. Valentine, 905 F.2d 1530, 1990 WL 74311 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

905 F.2d 1530
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth E. LANGLOTZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael J. VALENTINE, individually and in his capacity as
chief judge of Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic
Relations District Court; Vincent M. Picciano, individually
and in his capacity as director of court services of Fairfax
County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court; Joseph
Fedeli, individually and in his capacity as director of
residential services of Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic
Relations Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3856.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1990.
Decided May 10, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (C/A No. 87-777-A)

Kenneth E. Langlotz, Jr., appellant pro se.

Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., Edward Everett Rose, III, County Attorney's Office for the County of Fairfax, Fairfax, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va., 683 F.Supp. 1041.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth E. Langlotz, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Langlotz v. Valentine, C/A No. 87-777-A (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langlotz v. Picciano
683 F. Supp. 1041 (E.D. Virginia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 F.2d 1530, 1990 WL 74311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langlotz-v-valentine-ca4-1990.