Langlois v. State
This text of 933 So. 2d 1281 (Langlois v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Job LANGLOIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
PER CURIAM.
Job Langlois appeals the denial of his pro se motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Langlois's challenge to his March 4, 2003, judgment and sentence was untimely filed, the motion should have been dismissed rather than denied on the merits. Therefore, we reverse and remand to the postconviction court with directions to dismiss the motion as untimely. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); *1282 Lyell v. State, 872 So.2d 447 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 So. 2d 1281, 2006 WL 2088394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langlois-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.