Langley v. Prince

Fifth Circuit

Langley v. Prince

905 F.3d 924

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2018·No. No. 16-30486·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Langley v. Prince, 905 F.3d 924 (5th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

905 F.3d 924 (Langley v. Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related