Langley v. Prince

Fifth Circuit

Langley v. Prince

905 F.3d 924

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 2018

DocketNo. 16-30486

StatusPublished

This text of 905 F.3d 924 (Langley v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langley v. Prince, 905 F.3d 924 (5th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

905 F.3d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langley-v-prince-ca5-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack