Langley v. Palmer

30 Me. 467
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 Me. 467 (Langley v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langley v. Palmer, 30 Me. 467 (Me. 1849).

Opinion

Wells, J. orally.

— The note was made in such form as the defendant chose to accept and to negotiate. The election at which bank in Boston to call for the pay, was with the holder. A demand there was sufficient. Page v. Webster, 15 Maine, 249. The principle of that decision is applicable equally to a note payable in Boston, as in Portland. The notary certifies that the note was presented when payable, and that payment was refused, and that notice of the default was forwarded to the defendant. Plainly the default spoken of, was that of the non-payment stated before. The law prescribed no form. Taking the whole certificate together, all the facts necessary to charge the indorser, are found in it.

Judgment on the default.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank
86 S.W.2d 325 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Hazard v. Spencer
23 A. 729 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Me. 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langley-v-palmer-me-1849.