Langley v. Erway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langley v. Erway

30 A.D.2d 711, 290 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3815

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 711 (Langley v. Erway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langley v. Erway, 30 A.D.2d 711, 290 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Judgments affirmed, without costs. We affirm all findings of fact. We find dispositive of each case the fact that there existed no party committee “ representing the political subdivision ”, i.e., the senatorial district (Election Law § 137, subd. 4) in that in Schoharie County there had not been “ elected a Conservative Party county committee pursuant to the Election Law” (Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party of the State of New York, art. IX, § 6, subd. [a]) with the result that under said subdivision “ (a) ” only the State Executive Committee of the Conservative Party could authorize the designation. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court. [57 Misc 2d 1.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Judgments affirmed, without costs. We affirm all findings of fact. We find dispositive of each case the fact that there existed no party committee “ representing the political subdivision ”, i.e., the senatorial district (Election Law § 137, subd. 4) in that in Schoharie County there had not been “ elected a Conservative Party county committee pursuant to the Election Law” (Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party of the State of New York, art. IX, § 6, subd. [a]) with the result that under said subdivision “ (a) ” only the State Executive Committee of the Conservative Party could authorize the designation. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court. [57 Misc 2d 1.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 711, 290 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langley-v-erway-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack