Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n

167 P. 349, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 933
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 18, 1917·No. No. 14178·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the preceding case; American Fuel Co. v. Benton, ante p. 26, 167 Pac. 346, the motion of respondent to strike the statement of facts, filed and served untimely hy appellant without extension of time hy the trial court or hy stipulation or application therefor on good cause, is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n, 167 P. 349, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 933 (Wash. 1917).

167 P. 349 (Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seattle Merchants Ass'n v. Langley State Bank
170 P. 560 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)