Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n
167 P. 349, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 933
This text of 167 P. 349 (Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Langley State Bank v. Seattle Merchants Ass'n, 167 P. 349, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 933 (Wash. 1917).
Opinion
On Petition eor Rehearing.
For the reasons stated in the preceding case; American Fuel Co. v. Benton, ante p. 26, 167 Pac. 346, the motion of respondent to strike the statement of facts, filed and served untimely hy appellant without extension of time hy the trial court or hy stipulation or application therefor on good cause, is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seattle Merchants Ass'n v. Langley State Bank
170 P. 560 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
167 P. 349, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langley-state-bank-v-seattle-merchants-assn-wash-1917.