Langhoop v. Richfield Oil Corp.
This text of 259 A.D. 964 (Langhoop v. Richfield Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Although the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur cannot be applied to the facts set forth in the complaints, such complaints and the bills of particulars do set forth facts sufficient, if proven, to constitute causes of action. All concur. (The order denies motion by two defendants for a dismissal of the complaint in each of three actions to recover damages for the death of three persons who died in a burning building.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 964, 21 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langhoop-v-richfield-oil-corp-nyappdiv-1940.