Langham v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Langham v. United States

511 F. App'x 276

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2013

DocketNo. 12-7834

StatusPublished

This text of 511 F. App'x 276 (Langham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langham v. United States, 511 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Langham v. United States, No. 5:12-ct-03135-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[277]*277terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Langham v. United States, No. 5:12-ct-03135-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[277]*277terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 F. App'x 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langham-v-united-states-ca4-2013.