Langham v. State

144 S.W.2d 277, 140 Tex. Crim. 210, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 574
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 30, 1940
DocketNo. 21182
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.W.2d 277 (Langham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langham v. State, 144 S.W.2d 277, 140 Tex. Crim. 210, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 574 (Tex. 1940).

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was given seven years in the penitentiary on a charge of robbery.

The record contains no bills of exception and the statement of facts was filed 91 days after notice of appeal was given. Furthermore, the statement of facts does not bear the approval of the trial judge. We are, therefore, unable to consider it. Tex. Jur. Vol. 4, page 420, and cases there cited; Floyd v. State, 113 S. W. (2d) 894; Page v. State, 117 S. W. (2d) 785; C. C. P. Art. 760, Sub. 5.

We find no error apparent in the record.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Page v. State
117 S.W.2d 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Floyd v. State
113 S.W.2d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.W.2d 277, 140 Tex. Crim. 210, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langham-v-state-texcrimapp-1940.