Langham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Langham v. State

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 605, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 633

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 27, 1925

Docket16225

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 302 (Langham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langham v. State, 127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 605, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The three special grounds of the motion for a new trial (one the ground of newly discovered evidence, one the ground that a material witness for the State desired to change his evidence, and the other the ground of incompetency of one of the jurors) are without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The three special grounds of the motion for a new trial (one the ground of newly discovered evidence, one the ground that a material witness for the State desired to change his evidence, and the other the ground of incompetency of one of the jurors) are without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 605, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langham-v-state-gactapp-1925.