Langford v. State

120 S.E. 34, 31 Ga. App. 143, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Langford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Ga. App. 278
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1923·No. 14767·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

In this case exception is taken to a judgment overruling the defendant’s motion to stay and arrest a judgment of conviction. After conviction he filed a motion for a new trial, which motion was dismissed by the court, and the judgment dismissing it was affirmed by this court. 30 Ga. App. 278 (117 S. E. 659). Subsequently the motion to stay and set aside the conviction was filed. The court properly overruled and denied this motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langford v. State, 120 S.E. 34, 31 Ga. App. 143, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 34 (Langford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langford v. State
117 S.E. 659 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)